<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: new decade means new driving law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/</link>
	<description>a place for opinions and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 05:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=702#comment-615</guid>
		<description>i fully agree that there is a difference between having a conversation with someone in the car; which is less distracting than having the conversation with someone on the phone. in my above statements i&#039;m referring to &quot;the talking&quot; as the conversations over the phone, without making any reference to having a discussion with someone in the car. thus, any reference to &#039;talking&#039; or &#039;conversation&#039; is by default over a device and not with someone in the car (at least that&#039;s how i meant it above). 

i do have some reference that state talking on a hand held device is just as distracting as talking on a hand-free device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i fully agree that there is a difference between having a conversation with someone in the car; which is less distracting than having the conversation with someone on the phone. in my above statements i&#8217;m referring to &#8220;the talking&#8221; as the conversations over the phone, without making any reference to having a discussion with someone in the car. thus, any reference to &#8216;talking&#8217; or &#8216;conversation&#8217; is by default over a device and not with someone in the car (at least that&#8217;s how i meant it above). </p>
<p>i do have some reference that state talking on a hand held device is just as distracting as talking on a hand-free device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=702#comment-614</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have the references to hand, but I think that the research has shown that talking on handheld and hands-free cellphones are both worse than talking to a person who is actually in the car. I think that both  should be banned on that basis - however I&#039;m not aware of any jurisdiction that has banned hands-free phones yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have the references to hand, but I think that the research has shown that talking on handheld and hands-free cellphones are both worse than talking to a person who is actually in the car. I think that both  should be banned on that basis &#8211; however I&#8217;m not aware of any jurisdiction that has banned hands-free phones yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=702#comment-582</guid>
		<description>while i agree that there are numerous distractions while driving, and that the drivers should be responsible to stay focus while driving...the law itself is stupid. i have references which state there is no difference between talking on a handheld device versus a hand less device. it&#039;s the talking that&#039;s the problem. they should ban talking on a cell phone all together...and then it can be a first step towards making the streets safer. i agree that it will be hard to enforce the law of &#039;no talking on the cell phone while driving&quot;, but at least they would have tried to move towards a safer environment on the streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while i agree that there are numerous distractions while driving, and that the drivers should be responsible to stay focus while driving&#8230;the law itself is stupid. i have references which state there is no difference between talking on a handheld device versus a hand less device. it&#8217;s the talking that&#8217;s the problem. they should ban talking on a cell phone all together&#8230;and then it can be a first step towards making the streets safer. i agree that it will be hard to enforce the law of &#8216;no talking on the cell phone while driving&#8221;, but at least they would have tried to move towards a safer environment on the streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catintherain</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>catintherain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=702#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Almost two years ago I got hit by a car whose driver was talking on his cellphone, and I still get a bit jumpy when I see drivers do that in traffic. But I agree, there are tons of distractions, and they can&#039;t ban them all. Very loud music can be a distraction too, even the GPS can be a distraction (I once read an article about a driver who killed a pedestrian because he was looking at his GPS). It&#039;s hard to say where the control should stop. If the cell phone ban brings a lower number of accidents, I&#039;d be inclined to agree with it. But I don&#039;t know of any stats to support this theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost two years ago I got hit by a car whose driver was talking on his cellphone, and I still get a bit jumpy when I see drivers do that in traffic. But I agree, there are tons of distractions, and they can&#8217;t ban them all. Very loud music can be a distraction too, even the GPS can be a distraction (I once read an article about a driver who killed a pedestrian because he was looking at his GPS). It&#8217;s hard to say where the control should stop. If the cell phone ban brings a lower number of accidents, I&#8217;d be inclined to agree with it. But I don&#8217;t know of any stats to support this theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

