Skip to content
Archive of posts filed under the politics category.

on strike – to save ‘our’ lives

if you live in the greater vancouver are then you’ve probably seen the sign ‘on strike to savonstrikee lives’. well, as it turns out…we might as well get used to the idea of strikes. 2010 is fast approaching, and while many are blindsided by the olympics, there’s bigger events on the horizons for bc’s population. the provincial government is pretty much hoping everyone is amazed and captured by the olympics and completely ignores the problems waiting for all on the horizons.

a few years ago, with the olympics still a few years away, the liberal government had an idea. the idea was…calm and no hassle with collective bargaining agreements for all unions. how was that accomplished? well you probably guessed it, they threw money at the problem, and placed the end of the contract until after the olympics. thus, obtaining no hassle, no contract talks, no strikes, no headaches from any of the cupe sections during the time leading up to the 2010 games. well…all is well so far, people got most likely the percentage raises they were looking for, and all are happy. however, the effect of this is quite simple…most (if not all) agreements are pretty much set to end in 2010, just after the olympics. combine that with the recent ‘crisis’…and essentially we’re looking at a very long 2010 year. there’s no money to be thrown at the problem, costs have already been cut, and most likely the government will be looking to recover some of the cost. which will simply lead to long talks between both parties…with the simple outcome of more strikes.

judgeendsparameds_news

who’s to blame for this? it’s quite simple that the short-sighted liberal government is to blame for this. they patched up the problem, attached the band-aid solution…and now with the talks approaching we’re all going to pay for this. in their solution, they haven’t fixed anything, yet they managed to delay the inevitable. problem is…most contract talks are coming up in pretty much the same calendar year. what’s the solution? given our chicken government, we’re looking at a cheap and sneaky way out. chances are, there will be more lies fed to everyone. more promises made, waiting to be broken. there will be more cries of ‘we did not know the costs of the olympics’,'we did not anticipate the crisis’, and so on. i won’t be surprised if the liberals are quite hoping the current motions to dismiss the government will be completed. i wont’ be surprised if the liberals will actually help the process (in secret of course). why you might ask. well the thing is quite simple…when shit will hit the fan come post-2010 games…it will be massive. jobs will be lost, people will be pissed and strikes will happen all over the place. the blame will be thrown, quite rightly so, at the liberal government (even thou some or at least half the blame should be put on the shoulders of the fools that voted this government for a third time into place). the only question remains…if the elections (which you have to admit are quite imminent) will happen before the problems start or during. either way, come march 2010…we’re in a hole.

another four…

after 8 years of sitting in opposition the best the ndp could come up with was ‘take back your bc’. fair enough, however one must ask if this was the best approach. the statement is quite direct and if analyzed a bit it summarizes the method intended to be used in order to defeat the liberals; that being…insult and bash the liberals. throw mud at them, hoping it sticks and the ndp gets the majority of seats…that was not to be so.

i guess the ndp, lead by its fearless leader, did not pay attention to how the political race developed south of the boarder. the eventual winner of the presidential race overcame two campaigns of bashing by the opposition to win the presidency. in each he did start behind in the polls, yet he stuck to his guns, promoted who he was instead of destroyed or attempting to destroy the image/reputation of the opposition. to add to this, his opposition did just that…attempted at destroying his image…and lost. the ndp either didn’t pay attention or just simply did not learn. their only method throughout the campaign was to try and discredit the liberals. my take…don’t worry as the liberals have done it enough by themselves…trying to do more looks like it back-fired. so…perhaps it would have helped if at least half of the resources would have been wasted on promoting what the ndp stood for…what they planned to do…and how they plan to make bc better…somewhat similar to what the liberals choose to do. not to mention…it doesn’t help when the leader of the party trying to take over is seen as a potential premier that can’t do ‘no worst’ than the current one…overall, i don’t think this election was won by the liberals…but lost by the ndp due to a some quite foolish choice in how to promote themselves…

keep bc ‘strong’…

question is, for whom? the ones that steal from the population, the ones that already have the funds and thus acquire more…or the common folk? so, given it’s the 13th of the month…might as well start with some ‘good’ news…the liberals seem to have gotten what they’ve asked for…a 3rd consecutive majority government and a fail attempt at changing the voting system…given the stv (the sorry toothless voting system) didn’t pass. so, what does this mean? it’s quite simple…another run of 4 years lead by a drunk driver…

overall i have to get used to paying higher tuition fees, eventually get some convicts as neighbors, pay more and more for gasoline to fund the ‘neutral’ carbon tax, have to put up with building from scratch instead of expanding the current structure (i really wonder who will building the new bridge…and what their connection is to our drunken premier), and so on. quite useless to continue, given that by popular vote the liberals did get 46% of the total votes…which translated into 49 seats in the government. so, why should they care? well, the ones who stand to suffer either can’t vote or won’t vote given they gave up hope…yup, i am talking about the ones who work for the minimum wage (keep in mind we have the lowest minimum wage in the country)…so, keep be ‘strong’…question is from who’s perspective?