<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the stick, the stone and the puddle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.barzan.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.barzan.ca</link>
	<description>a place for opinions and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on new decade means new driving law by cris</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=702#comment-615</guid>
		<description>i fully agree that there is a difference between having a conversation with someone in the car; which is less distracting than having the conversation with someone on the phone. in my above statements i&#039;m referring to &quot;the talking&quot; as the conversations over the phone, without making any reference to having a discussion with someone in the car. thus, any reference to &#039;talking&#039; or &#039;conversation&#039; is by default over a device and not with someone in the car (at least that&#039;s how i meant it above). 

i do have some reference that state talking on a hand held device is just as distracting as talking on a hand-free device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i fully agree that there is a difference between having a conversation with someone in the car; which is less distracting than having the conversation with someone on the phone. in my above statements i&#8217;m referring to &#8220;the talking&#8221; as the conversations over the phone, without making any reference to having a discussion with someone in the car. thus, any reference to &#8216;talking&#8217; or &#8216;conversation&#8217; is by default over a device and not with someone in the car (at least that&#8217;s how i meant it above). </p>
<p>i do have some reference that state talking on a hand held device is just as distracting as talking on a hand-free device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on new decade means new driving law by Melanie</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=702#comment-614</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have the references to hand, but I think that the research has shown that talking on handheld and hands-free cellphones are both worse than talking to a person who is actually in the car. I think that both  should be banned on that basis - however I&#039;m not aware of any jurisdiction that has banned hands-free phones yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have the references to hand, but I think that the research has shown that talking on handheld and hands-free cellphones are both worse than talking to a person who is actually in the car. I think that both  should be banned on that basis &#8211; however I&#8217;m not aware of any jurisdiction that has banned hands-free phones yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on cheap prices means cheap training by cris</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/02/cheap-prices-means-cheap-training/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=736#comment-608</guid>
		<description>in the states one would have the option to sue more readily available. considering the puncture was minor, the upsetting factor was the disinterest of the manager. however, they have yet to reply to my complaint. 

no, i didn&#039;t get an infection. thanks ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the states one would have the option to sue more readily available. considering the puncture was minor, the upsetting factor was the disinterest of the manager. however, they have yet to reply to my complaint. </p>
<p>no, i didn&#8217;t get an infection. thanks <img src='http://blog.barzan.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on cheap prices means cheap training by catintherain</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/02/cheap-prices-means-cheap-training/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>catintherain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=736#comment-607</guid>
		<description>I guess people here don&#039;t sue as much as in the United States. I have heard stories from my American friends about store managers tripping over to give injured customers freebies and discounts, just to keep them from suing. I hope you didn&#039;t get an infection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess people here don&#8217;t sue as much as in the United States. I have heard stories from my American friends about store managers tripping over to give injured customers freebies and discounts, just to keep them from suing. I hope you didn&#8217;t get an infection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on trust the salesman by Rex Finucane</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/car-stories/trust-the-salesman/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Finucane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 01:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?page_id=666#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Hey, firstly I want to tell you that I try to follow your blog. Great post, I totally agree with you. Have a great day matey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, firstly I want to tell you that I try to follow your blog. Great post, I totally agree with you. Have a great day matey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on cheap prices means cheap training by cris</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/02/cheap-prices-means-cheap-training/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=736#comment-589</guid>
		<description>as a manager - when someone injures themselves in your store you react...you do not walk away. what would have happened in your store if someone came and stated i got injured inside your store?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a manager &#8211; when someone injures themselves in your store you react&#8230;you do not walk away. what would have happened in your store if someone came and stated i got injured inside your store?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on cheap prices means cheap training by alexuta</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/02/cheap-prices-means-cheap-training/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>alexuta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=736#comment-588</guid>
		<description>pps: Army &amp; Navy Costumer Service LOL!!!!!!!! go shop at the Bay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pps: Army &amp; Navy Costumer Service LOL!!!!!!!! go shop at the Bay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on cheap prices means cheap training by alexuta</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/02/cheap-prices-means-cheap-training/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>alexuta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=736#comment-587</guid>
		<description>you all complain when no one pays attention to u in a store, but when they say hi 3 times and ask if u need help, everyone&#039;s all &quot;god they are annoying, I JUST WANNA SHOP!&quot; 


ps: did u get a tetanus shot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you all complain when no one pays attention to u in a store, but when they say hi 3 times and ask if u need help, everyone&#8217;s all &#8220;god they are annoying, I JUST WANNA SHOP!&#8221; </p>
<p>ps: did u get a tetanus shot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on new decade means new driving law by cris</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 06:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=702#comment-582</guid>
		<description>while i agree that there are numerous distractions while driving, and that the drivers should be responsible to stay focus while driving...the law itself is stupid. i have references which state there is no difference between talking on a handheld device versus a hand less device. it&#039;s the talking that&#039;s the problem. they should ban talking on a cell phone all together...and then it can be a first step towards making the streets safer. i agree that it will be hard to enforce the law of &#039;no talking on the cell phone while driving&quot;, but at least they would have tried to move towards a safer environment on the streets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while i agree that there are numerous distractions while driving, and that the drivers should be responsible to stay focus while driving&#8230;the law itself is stupid. i have references which state there is no difference between talking on a handheld device versus a hand less device. it&#8217;s the talking that&#8217;s the problem. they should ban talking on a cell phone all together&#8230;and then it can be a first step towards making the streets safer. i agree that it will be hard to enforce the law of &#8216;no talking on the cell phone while driving&#8221;, but at least they would have tried to move towards a safer environment on the streets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on new decade means new driving law by catintherain</title>
		<link>http://blog.barzan.ca/2010/01/new-decade-means-new-driving-law/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>catintherain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.barzan.ca/?p=702#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Almost two years ago I got hit by a car whose driver was talking on his cellphone, and I still get a bit jumpy when I see drivers do that in traffic. But I agree, there are tons of distractions, and they can&#039;t ban them all. Very loud music can be a distraction too, even the GPS can be a distraction (I once read an article about a driver who killed a pedestrian because he was looking at his GPS). It&#039;s hard to say where the control should stop. If the cell phone ban brings a lower number of accidents, I&#039;d be inclined to agree with it. But I don&#039;t know of any stats to support this theory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost two years ago I got hit by a car whose driver was talking on his cellphone, and I still get a bit jumpy when I see drivers do that in traffic. But I agree, there are tons of distractions, and they can&#8217;t ban them all. Very loud music can be a distraction too, even the GPS can be a distraction (I once read an article about a driver who killed a pedestrian because he was looking at his GPS). It&#8217;s hard to say where the control should stop. If the cell phone ban brings a lower number of accidents, I&#8217;d be inclined to agree with it. But I don&#8217;t know of any stats to support this theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
