the stick, the stone and the puddle

just as phthalates, there are a bunch of different compounds that are included in the parabens family. some information can be found on: wikipedia (some common parabens are listed) and united states food and drug administration (FDA – updated last in 2006). i’ve ran across a site with a pretty good description of parabens and the worry about them; ‘the good human‘ it’s called. another site i came across had a story about the ndp mla gregor robertson’s mandate back in 2007, worth a read if you have the time.

the use in cosmetic products, according to the fda, includes anything from makeup to shaving products and antiperspirants. it is however law in the states to label parabens on the ingredients list if in the product. so, theoretically one should see them (keep in mind these things have aliases, so even if they are posted they may be hidden even to a trained eye).

most literature until now regarded parabens as ‘safe’. they are rapidly absorbed, metabolized and excreted. this essentially means they enter the body pretty quick…get used up and transformed (i’m not going to go into the mechanism at this point) and then excreted (in other words it leaves the body quite quick…so less chance of accumulation in the body). however, this is based on gastrointestinal track absorption (which is very quick). the absorption of parabens into the body and their metabolic pathway differs when they are absorbed through skin and into the fatty tissue. it’s assumed that the more hydrophobic the paraben is, the more likely it is that it will accumulate in fatty tissue (essentially the bigger the R group, the more likley it is to accumulate in fatty tissue because it won’t be as soluble in water).

sensitization occured after products containing parabens awere applied to broken skin. however, one might question if it was the parabens or not. however, some recent reports have reported adverse reproductive effects due to parabens (done in animals). they are thought to active estrogen receptors, and their capability of doing so depends on the shape and size of the alkyl group attached to the ester (the size of the R on the O – oxygen – see picture above).

to fuel the controversy, overall, they are thought not to be mutagenic; yet some reports exist that state parabens can cause chromosomal aberrations. limited animal experiments showed that parabens bind to oestrogen receptors. parabens were found in breast tumor tissue samples from animals. furthermore, levels of parabens were extracted from human breast tissue (mean concentration reported from a 20 human breast tumor study was found to be 20.6 ng/g +/-4.2). the parabens found were a combination of a few different paraben compounds. they can increase growth of human breast cancer cells. there has been a theory thrown out there, that since parabens are present in cosmetics applied to the underarm and breast area, that they can influence and are associated with breast cancer; according to the canadian cancer agency website this is not the case, no direct association has been shown. males are not quite that special, experiments on male rodents showed that butylparaben can alter reproductive function in male rates (including decrease sperm count). however, based on current literature it was conclucled that it is biologically implausible that parabens can increase the risk of breast cancer and effects on male reproductive effects.

at this point, the data associating parabens to various health outcomes is limited. more is definitely needed. the precautionary principle seems to have been applied by health canada when talking about the presence of parabens in cosmetic products. they probably have had some access to some things i either haven’t found, haven’t cam across or simply haven’t had access to. at this point, this one is a bit harder to link to specific health outcomes than phthalates. parabens are widely present in our daily lives, they are quickly absorbed if ingested…and seem to be absorbed rapidly through the skin. their ability to dissolve and stay in fatty tissue is dependant on the size of the R group (essentially the longer it is, the more organic it is…the more non-polar the molecule becomes).

based on yesterday’s post, today i’ll spent some time on phthalates. this is a group of chemicals used to soften and make plastics more flexible and durable. they are often called ‘plasticizers’. some quick general information can be found on the following sites: wikipedia, canadian cancer society, environmental working group (seems to me like an activist site), and many more. don’t be afraid to google the word if you want more information. as i said before, this is a group of particular compounds, so there’s more than one type of phthalate. a list of most common types of phthalates used is found on wikipedia. keep in mind though, chemical compounds most often have synonyms (or aliases).

why should we be concerned about these? well, phthalates are known to cause tumors and other abnormalities in livers of rats and mice (see canadian cancer society website). furthermore the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has classified some phthalates (Di (2-ethylhexyl)phthalate or DEHP) as ‘probable human carcinogens’. phthalates are known endocrine-disruptors in rodents (animal studies). animal fetal adverse effects have been noticed (specifically to di-butyl phthalate). fetal exposure occured through exposure to the mother. some of the effects on the male fetus include: decreas testosteron production, reduce sperm production and other problems with the reproductive system. other studies have reported association between exposure to some phthalates (monobenzyl- and mono-isobutyl phthalate) and small genital size in male off-springs. other abnormalities have been reported in rodent studies (growth of extra ribs in off-springs due to exposure to the mother) with exposure to higher levels. some human studies have been reported, and for the most part they tend to agree with animal study results, however…keep in mind the data on human exposure and effects is a bit scarced. associations have been noticed between mother levels of phthaltes in urine and effects in off-springs; however, association does not imply causation. there are currently cohort studies going on in the united states in regards to exposure of phthalates to pregnant women; so at some point these results will be available.

exposure of the population occurs to many consumer products, such as, but not limited to: clothing, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, children’s toys, glow sticks, building materials, lubricants, food packaging, etc. i haven’t placed these in any particular order. keep in mind, you shouldn’t jump off your seat and over-react. these chemicals are present, but you must realize that just because they are in the environment it does not necessarily mean they enter our body. the concern is, when they do enter and which products increase our potential exposure. there are various pathways of exposure, and they include: ingestion, inhalation, skin absorption and potentially intravenous injection.

exposure by injestion occurs if you put them in your mouth, meaning it mostly happens through food. however, these plasticizers are present in children toys…so if you baby likes to place his/her toys in her mouth…this is a potential pathway. food exposure, is reported to probably be the largest pathway of exposure to these compounds, however the levels vary with foods. the united states and canada are looking into exposure, studies are happening and they are looking to regulate it (i’m not sure of europe as i didn’t have time to look into that…).

inhalation exposure is possible if these compounds become airborne (either gas phase, or as part of dust). baking of polymer clays will cause these plasticizers to become airborne…which will increase potential inhalation. there have been reports of phthalates being present in household dust and working environment dust (office). however, there have been some reports that reported no correlation between household dust concentration to one particular phthalate (DEHP) and urine concentration in boys of that particular phthalate or its metabolites.

skin absorption can essentially occur if one comes into contact with these compounds through the skin. that’s where the cosmetics come in. cosmetic products (ranging from: sunscreens, personal care products, make-up, etc.) have been reported to contain phthalates. although in canada manufacturers are required to state the ingredients, this may not happen all the time. products brought in from other countries by the consumer may not meet these regulations. a report from 2005 (from the united states) stated that about 70% of the cosmetic products they purchased from the store contained phthalates, yet this was not identified on the label. the products included in them were: deodorants, fragrances, hair gels, mousses, hair sprays, hand and body lotions, nail polish. however, it’s great to see canada is taking a leader role and pushing for the ingredient list…

absorption depends on the following factors: concentration of phthalates in the product, lenght of time the product is in contact with the skin, solubility of particular phthalate (remember, just because it’s in the same class it does not mean it acts or behaves the same), chemical structure. it also depends on the place where the body comes into contact with the products, as for example the face, axilia and scrotum have an absorption 10 times higher than the absorption rate of the arm skin. some studies have estimated the rate of absorption through skin to phthalates, and overall the permeable rate is low. however…the longer the contact…the more will be absorbed.

furthermore, levels of various phthalates have been detected in the urine of pregnant women as well as in the breast milk (i can just hear one of my profs asking me to state the level and not simply say levels have been found. however…if anyone is interested in levels i’ll be more than happy to state them). at this point, there are still large data gaps: outdated diet exposure levels, a dose-response relationship has not been determined (not to my current knowledge), contribution of dermal exposure to overall exposure is not yet quantified, fetal exposure is known to potentially cause problems, but causation is yet to be established. given all these data gaps, it is quite hard to estimate or guess if the human levels to phthalates reported in humans are of concern, better yet of great concern at this point.

what can you do about if you’re concern about absorption through skin from cosmetics? well…look at the factors that contribute to skin absorbance and see which ones you can control. reduce time you wear the cosmetics, if they are not required, and see how much is need to get the desired effect (soften skin, etc.).

dietary intake, which is thought to be the major pathway of exposure to these compounds…keep an eye on the ingredients (even though given some of the regulations…some products will not have a list of ingredients). phthalates are used in plastic manufacturing…so if you’re afraid of it leaching (similar story to bisphenol A), then reduce usage of plastic containers or bottles…

word of caution, no need to over-react at this point. however, it’s worth it to stay informed and look up information about the products you use.

as i was passing by through the living room i paid attention to a news story. the story about potential hazardous ingredients found in make-up. now, before i talk about them and somewhat share my thoughts on the matter, i will add a large disclaimer. to this point i have not had time to do a thorough scientific research in the matter, however the two chemical classes of compounds reported in the news item are known to cause health effects, if exposed to them.

essentially the story is about two ingredients (phthalates and parabens) found in make-up that are known to cause serious health effects (either some forms of cancer, birth defects, or other toxicological effects) to the exposed population. the outcomes (or effects) are dependent on various factors. dose (essentially what goes into the body), length of exposure, dose required to cause effects (essentially how much of the chemical is required to see an effect), individual variability (people do not respond in the same way to the same conditions), compound specific composition and properties (some compounds just pass faster through the skin, other don’t). these are not all the factors as there are many more, but they are common. furthermore, they tend to work in a combined way, so it is hard to usually state one particular factor as the main ‘culprit’.

at this point, i’ll need to look into a few sources to get some information as to how potentially dangerous these two types of compounds are and how likely they are to get through the skin and into the body, but once i do i will post it here…in case anyone is interested to read it.

some things that one can do to reduce the risk…well for one there are things that each individual will have control over. the period of time make-up is worn is important. the longer you wear it, the longer the exposure time, the longer chemicals have to pass through the skin. thus, if not needed, make-up can be removed. the amount of make-up used (and this may go into one of the ‘rules’ of make-up … wear it as if you’re not wearing any…). it’s quite intuitive that if you put more make-up on, the more there will be there for you to be potentially exposed to. yes, the skin is a barrier against compounds entering our bodies…but different compounds have different affinity…they behave in a different ways and can enter the body through the skin (pores, cuts, etc.). how readily do phthalates and parabens enter through the skin? as soon as i’ll find out…you’ll read about it.

a few years ago health canada did pass on a regulation which forces manufacturers to list the ingredients in their products. this is to inform the consumer to potentially reduce risk; thus, the consumer may decide if they want or do not want to use the particular product. thus, take a look on your product box or container…it’s bound to have an ingredient list. for quite a bit of information, it’s strongly recommended you visit the health canada website. they will have information about particular compounds and things one can do to reduce the exposure. they also have news releases, and lists of compounds they consider toxic, compounds that are under review…and compounds that are banned from existing in consumer products in canada.

information is key to understand how these compounds can cause effects, so using search engines like google is a start. there are websites created by various action groups, some of which may be worth a look (however, best advice is take everything with a grain of salt). these websites may offer information, however they may also be subjective. furthermore, some of their conclusions may be over-reactions or based on perceived potential hazard, so…read, but don’t be afraid to question. some website that may be worth a look are: Prevent Cancer Now and Dying to look Good. while information is key to understand the potential hazard, try to understand the logic behind various arguments or ‘facts’. activist website may be informative in one way, but if they are to subjective they may overlook some information, which will make their case seem stronger than it actually is.

if anyone has questions or comments…don’t hesitate. also, once i have a bit more time to look through some scientific literature on the matter…i’ll share what i find. till then…wear with care