Skip to content
Archive of posts tagged health

killer looks?

as i was passing by through the living room i paid attention to a news story. the story about potential hazardous ingredients found in make-up. now, before i talk about them and somewhat share my thoughts on the matter, i will add a large disclaimer. to this point i have not had time to do a thorough scientific research in the matter, however the two chemical classes of compounds reported in the news item are known to cause health effects, if exposed to them.

essentially the story is about two ingredients (phthalates and parabens) found in make-up that are known to cause serious health effects (either some forms of cancer, birth defects, or other toxicological effects) to the exposed population. the outcomes (or effects) are dependent on various factors. dose (essentially what goes into the body), length of exposure, dose required to cause effects (essentially how much of the chemical is required to see an effect), individual variability (people do not respond in the same way to the same conditions), compound specific composition and properties (some compounds just pass faster through the skin, other don’t). these are not all the factors as there are many more, but they are common. furthermore, they tend to work in a combined way, so it is hard to usually state one particular factor as the main ‘culprit’.

at this point, i’ll need to look into a few sources to get some information as to how potentially dangerous these two types of compounds are and how likely they are to get through the skin and into the body, but once i do i will post it here…in case anyone is interested to read it.

some things that one can do to reduce the risk…well for one there are things that each individual will have control over. the period of time make-up is worn is important. the longer you wear it, the longer the exposure time, the longer chemicals have to pass through the skin. thus, if not needed, make-up can be removed. the amount of make-up used (and this may go into one of the ‘rules’ of make-up … wear it as if you’re not wearing any…). it’s quite intuitive that if you put more make-up on, the more there will be there for you to be potentially exposed to. yes, the skin is a barrier against compounds entering our bodies…but different compounds have different affinity…they behave in a different ways and can enter the body through the skin (pores, cuts, etc.). how readily do phthalates and parabens enter through the skin? as soon as i’ll find out…you’ll read about it.

a few years ago health canada did pass on a regulation which forces manufacturers to list the ingredients in their products. this is to inform the consumer to potentially reduce risk; thus, the consumer may decide if they want or do not want to use the particular product. thus, take a look on your product box or container…it’s bound to have an ingredient list. for quite a bit of information, it’s strongly recommended you visit the health canada website. they will have information about particular compounds and things one can do to reduce the exposure. they also have news releases, and lists of compounds they consider toxic, compounds that are under review…and compounds that are banned from existing in consumer products in canada.

information is key to understand how these compounds can cause effects, so using search engines like google is a start. there are websites created by various action groups, some of which may be worth a look (however, best advice is take everything with a grain of salt). these websites may offer information, however they may also be subjective. furthermore, some of their conclusions may be over-reactions or based on perceived potential hazard, so…read, but don’t be afraid to question. some website that may be worth a look are: Prevent Cancer Now and Dying to look Good. while information is key to understand the potential hazard, try to understand the logic behind various arguments or ‘facts’. activist website may be informative in one way, but if they are to subjective they may overlook some information, which will make their case seem stronger than it actually is.

if anyone has questions or comments…don’t hesitate. also, once i have a bit more time to look through some scientific literature on the matter…i’ll share what i find. till then…wear with care

4 months…and counting

well about this time 4 months ago i had my first morning coffee without a smoke. i had smoked for a few years by that point…and after strong considerations (and inputs from some) decided to not light up anymore. essentially the decision was taken about a month before, and i pretty much set a date when i was gonna quit. thinking that will help reduce the smoking and it will be easier. well, i smoked more as the days were counting down…but the decision was made…so on the 6th of november i didn’t light up in the morning…and instead drank my coffee while watching the morning news.

as mentioned a few months ago, i didn’t finish my last pack of smokes…and two were left in the pack. i did place it on my desk…and to this day the two smokes are still in the pack…waiting early for me to give them some attention. i decided not to use any sort of medication or any replacements….you could say i did it cold turkey. 4 months have passed…and i won’t lie…cravings came and went. some stronger than others…depending on the day, depending on the activities…and yes even on the weather. sunny warm weather, begging one to go for a walk or outside for some fresh air…well cravings kicked in. and they kicked in quite heavily. however…to this day i managed not to give in to temptation and suppress the cravings…which i’m fully aware at this point that they will never go away…and from time to time they will pay me a little visit…

why did i decide not to use any sort of medication help…essentially it’s because i have a hard time accepting that they will not have some sort of an unwanted secondary effect (those can range, vary and can be multiple). anyhow, to each his own i guess…but i wanted essentially to believe i can do it by ambition alone, quite selfish i guess…but so far it’s working. to those that want to use medication…my only thing to say is…talk to your doctor…as they should be well informed as to the side-effects and if the particular product is ok for you.

the white coat

so here’s something i’ve been noticing and observing for quite a few years. as many have probably seen, even if you didn’t give it much attention, doctors tend to walk around with their white lab coats pretty much the entire day. yes, that means that if they go for lunch, if the leave the hospital or their practice grounds, they will still wear their white coats. i’m quite unsure as to what the reason is, although one might be willing to venture a guess.

what’s my problem with it? well, let’s see. doctors usually deal with sick patients, on a daily basis they meet, talk and treat various people with a wide range of conditions. so, here’s a simple scenario…doctor treats patient, patient sneezes (remember, simple scenario), reaches the coat, doctor touches it eventually and wears his coat walking into the tim hortons across the street for coffee, bumps in line and other people get in contact with his white and ‘clean’ coat…and some transfer may and probably does occur of whatever was in the sneeze from earlier…

i admit it, it’s a simple scenario and it depends on how well the virus can survive on the coat, the amount, etc…however, doctors come in contact with various patients…essentially, come in contact with various pathogens…which can be transmitted indirectly into the community if the doctors wear their coats outside the appropriate environment. their coats are essentially the first point of contact, not for all doctors but for most of them. so, it’s not very hard to see that if contamination gets on these nice ‘clean’ white coats, the same pathogens can transfer to other places and thus indirectly pose a threat to the public. the risk of indirect transfer of various pathogens is there, if the doctors keep wearing their coats…and walk into public places (i.e. restaurants, coffee shops, markets, etc.).

futhermore, chemical safety for laboratory employees require lab coats to only be worn in the lab. walk into any commercial laboratory and you will not be allowed to wear your labcoat into the lunch room…let alone outsides the company. furthermore, lab coats are not to be taken home, so not to carry various contaminants (regardless of what they are) home and expose yourself and your family. thus, at least in british columbia, lab coats are to be washed by the employee. so, if we’re so keen on making sure some various chemicals don’t get into the lunch room or public places, then i am wondering why doctors get to carry their white coats from inside the hospital to the various places where they go and eat lunch? biological laboratories have similar regulations. so these sort of rules are used.

so, if this risk is there, i wonder and question why these doctors put us all at a potentially higher risk of contamination by not simply taking off their coats prior to leaving their working grounds? regardless of the level of contamination, prevention of a disease is always cheaper and more useful than treatment for it. last i recall, doctors take some oath to help sick people…then again, sick people is the ‘key’ word. so i guess by not taking off their coats while entering public areas, they’re just trying to make sure they keep having a job in this ‘crisis’ struck economy.