Skip to content
Archive of posts tagged opinion

show ‘must’ go on

given the media attention given to the latest flu, there’s no surprise that controversy appears due to it. now, while i won’t be talking about the h1n1 flu and how it can or cannot affect one, or the symptoms or how one can prevent it. a vaccine has been rolled out by pharmaceutical companies (in short supply…hint hint). at this point i’m not sure how much a shot costs, but i’m certain the quarterly profits of the manufacturers will surpass the expectations. anyhow, as it turns out due to the short supply of vaccines…there is a priority list set. the government figured they should get a priority list and ensure those in the high risk category (not yet sure how that is assigned and what makes one person high risk over the other…) will get access to the vaccine (if they so desire) first. well…as it turns out there is one factor that promotes one to the ‘priority’ list of getting vaccines; and if you haven’t guessed then you’re a bit to naive. yes, it’s called money.

a story was leaked to the media yesterday that the members of the calgary nhl team (the calgary flames) and their families received the h1n1 vaccines at a private clinic. as it turns out, you got money…you have priority. tier based health-care in effect in canada…yet again. i guess one would want to affect the hockey season if a player suddenly gets sick…after all the show must go on. so what if there’s no fans to watch because they’re battling the flu, at least the hockey teams will continue on playing. the organization denies any wrongdoing in this situation. the health authorities in alberta were somewhat quick to respond, and fired a person due to this situation; doubtful that the particular employee is actually the one responsible for this…they just had to find a scapegoat. calgary , unfortunately, is not the only team that is guilty of this. as it turns out, toronto based teams have acted in the same fashion.

so, i wonder what these teams will say to the family of the next h1n1 victim that didn’t get the vaccine because the next shipment didn’t arrive yet…yet professional players were allowed to receive the vaccines. i wonder how they will stand and pretend they are role models when they did not wait their turn like every other regular citizen. some are more equal than others. i am guessing here, but i doubt only these three teams (calgary flames, toronto maple leafs and toronto raptors) are guilty of cutting in line to get the vaccines. shame on the healthcare system for allowing this, shame on the organizations for pushing for this to happen…and shame on the players for going ahead with this. however, robyn regehr (a member of the calgary hockey team) stated he wasn’t aware there’s a short supply of vaccines. quite doubtful, given that has been the news for the past week.

edit (nov 5): as it turns out, british columbia officials are guilty of this too…a abbostford hockey team received the shot before high priority people in the city. i guess they are ‘higher’ priority given they spend time on the ice (and it’s cold on there)…and it’s important they keep on playing regardless of the surroundings.

on strike – to save ‘our’ lives

if you live in the greater vancouver are then you’ve probably seen the sign ‘on strike to savonstrikee lives’. well, as it turns out…we might as well get used to the idea of strikes. 2010 is fast approaching, and while many are blindsided by the olympics, there’s bigger events on the horizons for bc’s population. the provincial government is pretty much hoping everyone is amazed and captured by the olympics and completely ignores the problems waiting for all on the horizons.

a few years ago, with the olympics still a few years away, the liberal government had an idea. the idea was…calm and no hassle with collective bargaining agreements for all unions. how was that accomplished? well you probably guessed it, they threw money at the problem, and placed the end of the contract until after the olympics. thus, obtaining no hassle, no contract talks, no strikes, no headaches from any of the cupe sections during the time leading up to the 2010 games. well…all is well so far, people got most likely the percentage raises they were looking for, and all are happy. however, the effect of this is quite simple…most (if not all) agreements are pretty much set to end in 2010, just after the olympics. combine that with the recent ‘crisis’…and essentially we’re looking at a very long 2010 year. there’s no money to be thrown at the problem, costs have already been cut, and most likely the government will be looking to recover some of the cost. which will simply lead to long talks between both parties…with the simple outcome of more strikes.

judgeendsparameds_news

who’s to blame for this? it’s quite simple that the short-sighted liberal government is to blame for this. they patched up the problem, attached the band-aid solution…and now with the talks approaching we’re all going to pay for this. in their solution, they haven’t fixed anything, yet they managed to delay the inevitable. problem is…most contract talks are coming up in pretty much the same calendar year. what’s the solution? given our chicken government, we’re looking at a cheap and sneaky way out. chances are, there will be more lies fed to everyone. more promises made, waiting to be broken. there will be more cries of ‘we did not know the costs of the olympics’,'we did not anticipate the crisis’, and so on. i won’t be surprised if the liberals are quite hoping the current motions to dismiss the government will be completed. i wont’ be surprised if the liberals will actually help the process (in secret of course). why you might ask. well the thing is quite simple…when shit will hit the fan come post-2010 games…it will be massive. jobs will be lost, people will be pissed and strikes will happen all over the place. the blame will be thrown, quite rightly so, at the liberal government (even thou some or at least half the blame should be put on the shoulders of the fools that voted this government for a third time into place). the only question remains…if the elections (which you have to admit are quite imminent) will happen before the problems start or during. either way, come march 2010…we’re in a hole.

contract stranglehold

i recently ran across a friend’s post about customer service, and while i was tempted to add my 2 cents on to his blog…i figured i’d share my thoughts on my latest experiences (and yes i do mean experiences). prior to diving right in, a quick update. given the latest changes in my life, i had to contact a few providers in order to purchase their services (which included cellphone, cable, internet, and more).
at the beginning of this week i went to shaw to ‘plea’ my case and try to get a worth while package which should include high speed internet and an hd box. prior to this i did go by telus and got information on their latest offer (free basic hd for a student for a year, $10 off dsl internet, free hd box rental for the duration of the 3 year contract and $6 or $5 per package depending on the number of packages you get on top of the basic cable). well, this seemed a bit cheaper than what the regular price shaw had…but shaw has stepped it up a notch – they’re offering no contracts. so, on monday i went by the shaw tower (the only location in vancouver…) and decided to test the waters and see what they would offer me. to my surprise i didn’t really have to plea anything as they essentially threw a package at me that i just couldn’t refuse (yes somewhat of a godfather reference, but no guns). the offer, free 2 months full hd and high speed internet, and then $20 for their service for the next 10 months, with free rental of the hd box. i didn’t quite have a comeback or any desire to try and decrease the price.

the beauty of shaw is the fact that you don’t have to sign a long term contract, make the commitment in order to get the sweet deal. well, if you live in vancouver you most likely know that shaw is pretty much the only provider that offers this. by far the worst company to deal with when it comes to contracts is rogers wireless. at this point they are the only providers of a wireless service that uses sim cards (yes i know fido does too…but fido is rogers little b…., so your money still goes to rogers). anyhow, bell is bringing (or phasing i should say) this particular service in by the end of the year (i can’t wait). anyhow, long story here’s what happened.

first, a bit of background. i’ve had a rogers cellphone for about 7 years now. i have three lines on my account and i’ve had three lines for the last 3 years, and the previous 4 i had 2 lines. more or less, what i learned about rogers is…as long as you’re under contract you are just a little number to them and you won’t get any attention. that includes disrespectful customer representatives and lack of care. about 3 weeks ago i went by one of their retail locations (and if you’ve ever been to one, you know that it’s useless if you’re a customer already as those little pawns are useless. so, i decided to call customer service and ask to add a fourth line on the account, just offer me a better deal that a new customer would get (given i’ve been with them for 7 years). now, i have roughly 1 year to go on each of the three lines i have with them. so, the first customer representative that i got pretty much told me to ‘fuck off’, because i’m already getting a sweet deal which i shouldn’t be getting from them. essentially a few years back after my contract was done i called and tried to cancel because bell offered me the same place for $10 cheaper, so rogers matched it by giving me a $10 credit per phone per month on the account. after this, i told him the offer bell gave me 2 days earlier…even cheaper than i’m paying rogers right now (which would included 250 daytime minutes, called id, voice-mail, 250 txt, free bell to bell, weeknights from 7pm and weekends free all for $32/month which included the system access fee and tax…sweet deal). so i asked rogers to match, so that i don’t have to get bell at this point. the customer rep shortly told me no, we can’t, you’re getting a good enough deal, plus we have the best network service available, implying i won’t switch. i inform him that their network does fail quite frequently…at which point he states…it’s due to my phone because it’s 2 years old. it’s two years old…if the phone wont’ work properly after two years…then why have a 3 year contract…

anyhow, called again and talked a new rep. he was more helpful…and to some extent had a bit more professionalism in his approach. however, he offered me a plan at the price for a new customer…stating that in a few months i can call and ask them to change it by stating i have 4 lines and i’m loyal, so please decrease my payments (they won’t do that now…doubtful they will when i have a plan which has just under 3 years left). anyhow…i pretty much said thanks…i won’t get it.

so, i call again on friday august 21st. i talked to a rep, an incompetent arrogant fool, so i asked to be transferred to a supervisor. he transferred me, the only thing is that he pressed the ‘hung-up’ button rather than the hold button (i’m assuming it wasn’t ‘intentional’). anyhow, i called back and demanded to speak with a supervisor right away. however, the new rep decided he can help me…of course quite useless…so after wasting 10 more minutes he did transfer me to the floor supervisor. the only thing the supervisor was saying was…we can’t and we apologize…so i asked if there is anyone that has the power to change my account or make an actual decision. so, the supervisor from sales transfers me to the customer relations department at 6:30pm pacific time. i wait on hold for 15 minutes, after which i decide to call back later.

i called 30 minutes later and asked specifically for the customer relations department, at which point i was informed they are closed and have been closed since 6pm pacific time. apparently the sales department stays open till 8pm pacific time, but not customer relations….one can surely see what their biggest priority is. anyhow, i essentially got hung up once and the second time i got transferred to a closed department by a supervisor. if she doesn’t know what time the other department closes in her own company (nor was she willing to check prior to sending me there) how is she even capable of managing the floor…

anyhow, i called again on august 24th, to inform them that i am quite unhappy with their service, lack of respect and professionalism. the customer rep realized he won’t be able to actually calm me down, so he states i will get your information and you will get a supervisor contacting you tomorrow (august the 25th). it’s thursday, august 27th and i have yet to get a call back.</br>

on top of this, i did write them a feedback online. and to their reply by email, i responded with an explanation of the events.

why did i not cancel yet, well essentially the fee i must pay is about $600+. while this is doable, they are the only ones with a sim card and i doubt i will get a better deal if i come back to them as a new customer. i can’t yet go to bell…so i must wait till december-ish, once they have their sim cards out.

as soon as your under contract you won’t get the service (and yes…there are more out there). now this is not specific to rogers, telus behaves the same, bell (based on what i’ve heard) behaves similarly. so the best you can hope for is get the best deal possible prior to signing the contract, as you’ll live it for 3 years. time and time again, rogers has proven that a customer under contract is just a small figure for income. we pay through our nose for cell phone service…they charge every small feature…and on top of this…good luck getting attention. go to europe, where there is more competition…you have cheaper phone plans and more features included in the plan. you get more bang for your dollar (well…euro there). at this point, the cheapest you can hope to pay per month is $35 (to include the access fee and tax) and for that you basicly just get to talk to a few people…no voice-mail nor called id. i hope that vodafone decides to bring its business over here…have some healthy competition. so customer service..certainly, just make sure you’re not under contract.