Skip to content
Archive of posts tagged stupidity

and so it ends…

with disgrace, disgust and disappointment. disappointment for an entire country. a country, who’s last hopes of entertainment and dreams were shattered by a corrupt system that clawed its way into a beautiful sport. a system that has infected a country…entered a sport…it entered football and the effects seem to be long-lasting. until now there was somewhat of a trace of hope…even if that hope was based on the stupidity of the most overrated star in romanian history (yes…i am talking about drug-struck mutu). a team lead by an injury prone defender (too bad you came to late chivu), a goalkeeper who can’t seem to be more than a bench-warmer outside of romania, and a drug-user in the attack. anyone else that plays well outside of romania does not have a place on the field for romania in the eyes of the worst player to ever put on a national jersey (yes…we still remember the gambling, the arrests, the dumb comments and the overall idiotic attitude piturca…).

what happened? it’s simple…quite too simple actually…it starts from the top…with the federation’s ‘leader’…a shady double-faced character…by the name of sandu…the same guy that runs the romanian football federation as if he wants it to fail. the same guy that changes his word depending on who’s words are sweeter (given the ‘favorable’ referring romanian received after sandu screwed over the uefa president a few years ago). regardless…it’s not as if he will step down…so we can at least not dream about it.

lack of professionalism from the coach…on top of that…there’s a clear lack of dignity (let’s not forget he wont’ resign because getting him fired…will pot him around half a million euros)…and on top of that a clear lack of contact with reality. after the loss against serbia…he stated quite calmly…’that serbia passed the center line just 6 times’…why would they need to pass it more often if they played most of the game in the romanian half? better yet…why worry to pass it more often if they scored 3 goals with those 6 times?…that’s a 50% efficiency…quite a different team if you’d ask me?

after the austria game…he states ‘we lost a game…that’s all’. obviously…everyone knows romania lost a game and with destroyed mutu’s dream at snorting coke off a south african woman…the question is will he take responsibility? probably not…and thus the eternal pain will continue for a country that simply has nothing else to look forward to. at least until now…football was something to look for in order to forget the corruption of the system…now the system took over football…

the best joke today on april 1st…is that the romanian ‘national team’ showed up for a game…

more tax…more tax…

how’s the crisis from your side of the monitor? well…as it seems some things are good (somewhat cheaper gas – yet not nearly as cheap as it should be given that the oil price is incredibly low), and some…quite bad. this morning some stats were provided…and without anyone getting surprised…in british columbia there were 4900 jobs lost …while in canada the number is 83000…all in the month of february. the unemployment rate…well it’s at 7.7 in canada…and bc stands a bit lower, but then again our industry is no-where to be found.

so, given this recent update…what does translink propose? more tax…yes tax on cars, gas, pay parking…and eventually on ticket prices for their already worthless services. now, i’m not a financial analyst, i don’t pretend to know a lot about finances…but it seems that almost every year we hear the same story from translink…they need more money…to get this they want to ‘raise tax for drivers’… and why? sure, reduce emissions…congestion on the road..etc. however, how about they start doing a better job with their finances. take a lesson from icbc or worksafebc – yes both of those invest money…and usually make a killing in profit…i guess translink should take some 1-on-1 lessons from those two companies…or at least try to ‘steal’ their accountants… then again…why bother when they can just ask the government to increase tax..instead of say increase the standard of their services. security on public transit? i don’t think i need to visit last years events at or inside sky-train stations.

according to a translink official…they want to do this to raise necessary funds to be able to provide better for the community…and if they can reduce the number of cars on the road…then the more the better…warning though…if not allowed to raise money…they will be ‘forced’ to reduce their service…my question is “what service?”

as i was driving from school yesterday i have another ‘hands-on’ experience with the quality of the translink bus drivers…i started at a stop sign, bus was coming from the adjacent road and he had a sign of ‘yield’. now, on the buses in vancouver there is a yield sign on them…to essentially warn drivers that it’s the law for us to yield to the bus when they pull onto the lane from a bus stop – in other words…to let them cut into traffic (regardless of whether or not the drivers can actually break and let them in). anyhow…sign on the street was a yield to him…and i had priority. not only did he not stop seeing as i’m coming…he didn’t even attempt to break…and essentially cut in front…thus, i was forced to break to make sure i don’t ‘take’ the bus home. i’m just wondering out loud here…but which yield sign should have been followed? the one on the bus (which essentially is there to yield to the buses then they come out of the bus stop) or the regular road-sense yield sign that is sitting on the pole on the side of the road?

a few months ago, when i was still taking the bus to school…i entered one of the buses in the morning, sat down…and essentially tried to zone out as much as possible given the bus was packed more efficiently than a can of sardines. during roughly a 35 minute bus ride…the bus driver slammed on his breaks about 5 times. one of which…caused 3 people to lose grip and fall…one of which manage to hit me in the process – now it wasn’t his fault, and he did appologize…but you can understand the reason as to why translink received a complaint (the beauty of feedback forms). anyhow, the other thing that occurred was…a simple case of almost ending up with the bus on its side…the driver takes a small curve a bit to fast…and the wheels end up hitting the curb…and the bus tilts to a side…that was pretty much one of the last times i took the bus to school…ever since then…i’m “polluting more”.

another story occurred while i was still working towards my undergraduate degree…taking the bus on my way home…i ended up pretty close to the driver…standing and pushing to make sure i have a grip. the bus driver..decides it’s time for lunch…so she places her bowl of soup (which still looked warm) in between her legs…takes a spoon…and consumes her lunch…while driving the bus…at roughly 60-70km/h (yes i could see the speedometer)…down the hill from sfu (for those who know the school…i think they’ll understand)…i think the bus had probably more than 150 people on board…

there’s plenty more stories about the standard ‘quality service’ translink offers…in terms of drivers…but really…there’s much more to their service…lack of public transport in the outer cities of gvrd…the buses which are usually late…and the bright decision of making a sky-train loop (although it benefits me from a subjective point of view) in burnaby…rather than expand the skytrain to cities like coquitlam, port moody…richmond (which they are currently doing).

so…if their proposed taxes don’t go through….they’ll cut the service? yeah…what service?

if you built it, they will come

…and that’s probably what the solicitor general is hoping for. as it seems, the solicitor general’s plan is to build a maximum security prison right in the middle of burnaby (one of the cities making up the greater vancouver area), across from bcit (british columbia institute of technology – post-high school education facility), down the road from a high school, nearby numerous business (such as electronic arts, ibm), houses and yes…right besides a highway (yes, we still call canada no.1 a highway). apparently…numerous (the number 80 was thrown out there) sites were analyzed…and the solicitor general concluded that the area right across from bcit in burnaby is an apropriate site to built such a facility…i guess it should benefit the criminalistic students at bcit if they want to have first-hand experience…as they will simply just cross the road and visit the facility…brings a whole new meaning to the question ‘why the student crossed the road’.

a website has been made to inform the public about this, no burnaby prison, where one can get information about meetings, the current petition and what else can one do. on top of this, i must admit…i am very impressed with the steps the burnaby cityhall have taken…they have not only opposed the plan…but passed a vote to re-zone the area…such that no prison can be built on it. way to go to the cityhall, the mayor and wheover else was involved…this most likely won my vote in the next elections…

now onto the solicitor general…what in the world was he thinking? build a maximum security prison…in the middle of a city? usually these facilities should be build on the outskirts of cities as to minimize contact with society….why should society be punished twice? then again…no better way to decrease land value around the center of burnaby…but by building something like this.i guess as long as it’s not in his back-yard…he doesn’t care. let’s not forget than when the plans to build the new skytrain line to richmond were being debated…the ‘creme of vancouver’ opposed the line to go through some specific areas…even though that would have cut costs down since there were tracks there already…and it would have made it easier to move students and other workers to ubc (yes bias on my part). however…if the skytrain was a problem for them…how can the solicitor general imagine a prison won’t be a problem if built in the middle of a city?

i also guess it makes perfect sense…the prison guards can use public transit to get to work…so decrease on car emissions?

from 80 sites…the field in the middle of burnaby seemed more appropriate? what were the other fields?

what’s the point of a new prison if our current justice system lets most offenders walk? shouldn’t that be a more urgent matter…deal with what seems a broken justice system…rather than impose a maximum security prison in the middle of a metropolitan area?

this is the same goverment that’s looking to get re-elected in a couple of months…keep up the good work!!!