Skip to content
Archive of posts tagged united states

can vote, can’t drink…

as i’m writing my essay for the environmental ethics course i’m currently enrolled in and trying to argue for and against various morality sources, i’m reminded myself of a quick conversation with the sales person at the bc liquor store the night before. as i was purchasing some much need ‘oh’, the cashier asks me kindly if i’d like to donate something to support dry grad. i answered, in my sister’s words (kind of), ‘i’d rather not, they need to drink while they’re young so that they learn their lessons sooner’. take this at face value, and don’t over react…i’m not implying a 14 year old should be drinking…but i think if a person is allowed to vote (18 pretty much anywhere) then that person should be considered mature enough to handle a bottle of beer. afterall, society ‘trusts’ the 18-yr old kid is mature enough and should stat his/her opinion as to who should run the country, province (yes pronvicial elections are coming soon in a town near you if you’re in bc…) or city…then how come he or she is not mature enough to decide whether or not he or she can have a bottle of beer, a glass of wine, a shot of tequila…or in the case of some…all of the above?

well, in canada…you’re allowed to vote at 18…yet you have to wait another year to drink an alcoholic (the ‘oh’ thing i was referring to earlier for those non-chemists) beverage. i guess every fool is allowed to mark an ‘x’ on a piece of paper to decide which ‘diplomatic speaker’ will lead our way for the next ‘n’ number of years…but that person is not mature enough to handle alcohol…come to think of it…i think, and correct me if i’m wrong, but you can get married and still not be allowed to drink in canada…kind of a boring wedding for the groom and/or bride if you’d ask me…given they can’t even toast with real champagne. better yet, you can have children and be a parent and still not be allowed to have a bottle of beer. fair enough if one says that’s a bit extreme, but you can become a parent at 18, and be married, and still not be allowed to buy a beer to enjoy the hockey game after putting your kid to sleep…

at least canadians don’t have as bad as the neighbours down south…their drinking age is…21 (in most states). let’s see…they’re allowed to vote at 18 (anyone remember the last president…i think i rest my case on this one), they’re allowed to carry guns once they’re 18…obviously get married…etc. so…the voting thing…well it’s pretty much the same as canada…just that now the young adults are not trusted to drink until they’re 21…that’s 3 years after they have been trusted to mark an ‘x’ as to whom should be president.

an 18 year old is quite qualified mentally to handle a gun, loaded gun that is…given they’re allowed by constitution to bare arms…yet can’t trust him with that glass of beer…can’t give them a glass of wine…because they might get upset and cause a riot…yet they’re mature enough to carry a loaded weapon in their car…quite rational…by anyone’s standards!!! mature enough to not only carry a gun, but use it…and essentially have the capability of ending a life or more…however, can’t touch that alcohol…that’s just taboo…come to think of it, if they do shot someone at 18…they will be tried as an adult…yet not adult enough to enjoy that famous tennessee whisky (whiskey)! so…under 21…then you’re considered a minor in terms of drinking…yet a mature adult when it comes to…voting, carrying guns, etc…quite rational…

…the change

well…it’s the 20th of january…2009…the day of ‘change’ has finally arrived. the inauguration of the new president of the united states will commence today. stars and record crowds have been announced in washigton…however, all this attention leads me to question if this will actually work. i guess i need a bit more proof than a ‘yes we can’ speech. after-all, it’s still the same united states, even if a new president will start his ‘job’ today. i wonder if he will be allowed to bring change…i guess we’ll have to wait and see…

and history was written

the most anticipated election in the united states have come and gone, but they’ve done so with a ‘boom’. history was written, the first african-american president of the united states was chosen by his ‘peers’ to lead them through what is described as the worst financial crisis (by the president-elect himself) of the last century. a ‘to-do-list’ undesired by most is about to be taken on by a man who leads by inspiration. on november 4th the americans have finally made a decision that any other ‘reasonable’ human being would, and turned the white house into the blue house. a leader said to be ‘one of their own’ is, after almost 2 years of campaigning, now set to take the reigns of a country on the verdge of a major collapse. thanks to the current president, no names required i hope, the united states did what most of the international world expected them to.

approximately a 66% attendance, the highest since the early 1900s, showed up to vote yesterday. many for the first time. their reason, they wanted change. they desired and demanded change. one man promised it now the burden of proof is on him. to say that the magnifying glass has just increased 1000x when analyzing the president-elect’s new few moves is an understatement. his victory speech provide more proof as to why this one man should be given the chance to re-built and repair the country that a texan so easily destroyed.

canadiens on their part were far more interested in the elections down south than their own. rightfully so, who wouldn’t sit and watch as history unfolded before their eyes. watch a leader move and inspire. watch a person that sparked an interest with the younger generation. the generation that eventually gave him the support he so desired. the minorities feel he’s one of their own. statistically speaking the younger generations supported the democrat candidate. the only generation that gave the majority of its votes to the republican are the ones over 50. a promising wave of change seems to approach.

the university of victoria even went a step forward and prepared a once-in-a-life-time class for this current semester, called ‘obama vs. mccain’. a political class that was set up and provided with these elections in mind.

the americans ‘demanded’ change, now we all wait and hope it is delivered. the opportunity presents itself, and now it’s the president-elect’s chance to make good on his word. no need to doubt, but afterall it’s still the united states. the same country that so eagerly goes to war for peace, the same country that sees nothing wrong with owning ‘x’ number of guns in the house for protection, the same people that believe the world revolves around them. 2 years of campaigning? seriously, how much money can one waste? wouldn’t 6 months be enough? pre-election of the candidate, numerous trips from state to state and simply to many ways to manipulate the thing americans pride themselves the most with, democracy. if there’s anything more confusing than the way the elections are conducted in the united states it’s probably why the current president was elected twice. i guess it’s never to late to admit wrong-doing, too bad the lives lost in useless wars can’t be recovered. each candidate visited about 7 states on november 3, and i highly doubt they drove a hybrid car. i wonder if there’s anyone out there willing to estimate not only the money wasted on fuel, but the impact on the environment due to the burned fuel and other wasted produced. last i recall, the green movement was ‘big’ on the political agendas, then again i guess one would really say anything to get elected.

the votes are in, the majority decided and the president-elect of the united states is barack hussein obama II. now we wait.