Skip to content
Archive of posts tagged waste of money

trust the salesman

…to make sure the profit is maximized at the cost of the buyer. i’ve been in the market to purchase a new car for the last month or so. prior to even walking into a dealership, i started looking online to see the options given my student budget. the cars that stood out were the yaris, corolla, mazda3, honda fit and nissan ventra. they were priced close to each other, and each had it’s benefits and cons. while looking at various car options, i started reading the following websites (thanks tom for the advice): http://carbuyingtips.com/, and http://carcostcanada.com/. there’s plenty of information on the websites, from scams and tricks salesmen play, to how much a car really cost. worth reading the websites, it could save you from making a bad deal and/or could save you a few hundred dollars. so essentially for some that might not know, the dealer purchases a car from the manufacturer and they ‘pay’ a price. there is a hold back (3-6% of the car price) which is given back to the dealer once the car is sold. on top of that the manufacturer has rebates and/or incentives for the dealers – which are not publicly available nor noted on the sale invoice the dealer is given. keep in mind the dealer not only makes enough money off the car to keep the people hired with a salary and pay for the location (including utilities, rent and other taxes), not to mention the dealer’s profit. essentially, for a $20,000 car the dealer actually paid more or less close to 50% of that. moreover, the more cars a dealership sells, the higher ranked they are – which translates into more $ and better rating.

after a few visits to various dealerships, i decided to purchase the mazda3 and i send several salesmen an email asking for a quote. after exchanging emails with a few salesmen i made an offer with $1000 less than the sticker price for the car. some salesmen stated they would agree to a discount, but not $1000, while two different salesmen agreed to the price. here’s how each of them made sure to not only lose a sale, but essentially push me towards purchasing a toyota corolla instead.

the first salesman that lost my business was a morrey-northshore mazda salesman (one of the first salesmen i’ve seen in person) due to his aggressive strategy coupled with poor grammar and borderline insulting tone. he was fully aware i wanted the car, i test drove it at his location and thought i would not stand by my offer. his reply to my offer was by email and phone, stating it’s simply too low. however, once i thanked him for his time and stated i will make the deal with another dealership he responded that his manager agreed to the price as well. i asked him to make me a sweeter offer in order to come back given his firm stand the day before. his frustration took over at this point, and kept pushing for me to come in but without stating a starting point for the offer. all i wanted was to decide on the price of the car, have it in writing so that it decreases the time spend at the dealership. regardless, after a few pointless emails, he emails me stating:

If you think $19690 is lot money for you,why don’t you come in to do the deal.instead back & for on Email.If you want one ,come and get it,that ‘all i have to say.Is it very difficult for you to come down. I’ll been honest with you.You got nothing to loose!

the offer on this, is $370 lower than the offer i had to him. i reply, agreeing to go in and finalize the deal and we email back and forth and settle on a time for the next day. however, about an hour later he sends me an email apologizing for his ‘typo’, he actually meant to write ‘$19960′. i thanked him for his time at this point and told him it’s in my best interest to take my business somewhere else where the salesman stands by his word. his reply was something one would expect from a recent ex-girlfriend that just found out there is no way to repair the relationship. his email was still full of grammar and spelling errors. his rant was apparently due to the fact that i wanted to negotiate by email. which is understood, because then there’s proof of what has been talked about. i guess it’s easier to ‘fix’ the intentional errors if one is on the dealership’s floor. so apparently the ‘right’ way to purchase a car is to show the commitment by being there in person and wait around for hours till a deal is finalized. anyhow, he ended the email by wishing me a “Marry Christmas”. i simply replied asking him to inform his manager as to the reasons (poor attitude, bad grammar and the fact that he is error prone) of why he lost a sure sale. just when you would think he probably would realize that it’s perhaps wise not to push it even more he tells me to go get my deal somewhere else.

the second salesman that lost my business is currently employed at freeway mazda in surrey. i emailed them asking for a quote and with the second email i offered them my price ($16,200 for the car plus the additional taxes). he accepted and asked me to come by. i drove down on saturday after visiting wolfe mazda (and i thank the salesman there for giving me advice to make sure i hold freeway mazda to the deal they accepted on paper…thank you!). after over two hours being spent at the dealership i ended up accepting an offer made by the salesman. by this time it was 4:30pm and the financial office was closing, the insurance was not going to get done and the car i wanted was not going to get prepared so that i could leave with it. so, i told the salesman i will be back the next day. the deal i accepted was essentially $400 above the email price due to some ‘technicalities’ as it seemed. i assume responsibility for not standing for the price originally agreed over email. however, the salesman did not agree to accept my trade in (my old car), and the next morning i informed him that i simply cannot come down to accept the offer from the previous day because i won’t be able to make the payments and i will be left with two cars – given i wanted to trade the old one in. after a few minutes talking over the phone, the salesman accepts the original price and confirms an acceptable amount for my trade in. he confirms (twice) the price and assures me the manager has accepted. so i drove to surrey, yet again. as expected the manager and the salesman take my car for a spin, they seem to like it and the salesman confirms again the deal. so, the next step is finalizing the deal in the financial office. at which point i ask the finance manager what is the price of the car before tax – and he informs me a price with and increase of $200. the salesman is brought in – and surprise surprise he has a case of amnesia in regards to the offer he accepted and confirmed three times (twice on the phone and once on the floor of the dealership). his reason – the manager misunderstood the deal and accepted the trade-in value at the increased price. i thanked him at that point and i walked out.

however, the story doesn’t end there. the following morning the salesman has the balls to email me and state that’s it’s too bad the deal couldn’t get done due to $200. implying i should just pay and buy his car. i don’t see why i have to suddenly accept a different price that what was originally agreed upon. anyhow, if that was all…i guess it would be ok. however, given they looked at the papers for my car, they made copies of my insurance (which includes the car information). so it seems (and this i only found out hours ago when i sold my car)  that after i left the dealership, the salesman or the manager edited the status of my car and labeled it as a ‘trade-in’. essentially making the car ‘sold’ to them even though i never signed anything. i found out about this tonight when i sold my car privately and was informed of the status of my car by the insurance broker. he asked some questions, but in the end it was clarified and the car is sold. however, what the dealer did is despicable. label a car a ‘trade-in’ after i walk out of the dealership  as revenge that i did not accept their little game.

with all that, on monday morning i emailed toyota dealers for a quote on a toyota corolla 2010. all i have to say it’s that by the end of the evening i signed for a new 2010 corolla. it was that simple. they offered the right price, the right options and did not f..k around when i walked into the financial office.

what did i learn? a salesman should be trusted to ensure his pocket is as thick as it could be. they will play games and try to pull tricks. they usually come in a pack of three. the salesman, the manager and the financial manager. they all know the price they want to sell at. they all know where the additions are. they had it when you have it written down and they hate it if it’s their word that is on paper. get in on paper and get everything they promise on paper to make sure you receive it. a salesman will sell his own skin if the price is right – that you can take to the bank. the tricks i’ve seen pulled in the last few days were all described on the websites i mentioned earlier. reading those prior to walking into the dealership was quite a good idea. the salesman will make ‘mistakes’, however the mistakes will usually cost the buyer not him. the mistakes are never on their end. if they agree to decrease the price on one side, make sure they will re-gain it in another way. negotiate by email and you have proof of a deal, but make sure you’re willing to stand by your word to ensure you keep the salesman to his word.

british columbia environmental & occupational health research network

northstudio_logo

i just returned from the annual general meeting for the british columbia environmental & occupational health research network (in short bceohrn). it’s a network for everyone who is involved in some sort of research in bc. the network strives to get researchers from different disciplines talking to each other. why? well it’s simple… applying things learned in one discipline can make the difference in another, and can be used to complete various things in another field. in short, it’s called inter-disciplinary work. moreover, the network offers (or better yet offered…thanks mr. premier) travel bursaries and research capacity funding (both are things i have had the pleasure of enjoying – but more on that later). have a look at the website, as there is something for everyone, from job postings, to gray literature, to contacts, to databases of researchers in bc, and much more.

the network was started a few years ago, and has operated from funding from the michael smith foundation (a foundation in honor of the british-born canadian nobel prize winner in chemistry). the michael smith foundation operates from funding from the provincial government and distributes the funding to researchers, supporting and funding graduate work as well as professors, and networks such as bceohrn. earlier this year (september 2009), the provincial government decided it’s wise to cut funding to michael smith foundation…which in turn had no choice but to cut promised funding (yes, funding that was promised had to be taken back or not offered) to numerous networks, graduate students and other researchers. due to this, bceohrn’s funding will cease as of march 31, 2010. it’s embarrassing that provincial government decided to cut funding to the foundation in honor of a nobel prize winner, yet still funds various shady projects and organizations; while failing to investigate how their money is being wasted by those shady organizations. it’s not that surprising, i guess our premier needs the extra funds given that alcohol prices have gone up.

why do i care? well, bceohrn provided different types of funding to support my research and me as a graduate student. the first funding i even got was from bceohrn (the capacity grant for one of my thesis projects). this meant a lot, given i was just starting my research career and they offered to support one of my projects. on top of that, i obtained the traveling grand (twice), which gave me the opportunity to travel to seattle in 2008 for a health conference and in 2009 to travel to eastbourne (england) for another conference. they helped propel me into research and allow me to present my work. in terms of my research and studies, they have sure reached the objectives they state on their website. i’m not the only one that had the pleasure to be helped by this network. overall 65 travel bursaries have been granted in total. that implies a lot of students had the chance to present their work and help promote research happening in bc.

there’s probably a slim chance that the liberal government will have a change of opinion in regards to funding research in bc (i guess science it’s just not that important…). but, if you feel like stating your opinion in regards to funding for michael smith (and indirectly for bceohrn) here’s a draft letter that can be forwarded to your mla, or the following:

Premier Campbell – premier@gov.bc.ca
Minister Falcon –
kevin.falcon.mla@leg.bc.ca
Adrian Dix – adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca
John Challis, President & CEO, MSFHR – jchallis@msfhr.org

without research it’s hard to believe we will move forward, so if you feel it’s important to share your opinion, please do.

on strike – to save ‘our’ lives

if you live in the greater vancouver are then you’ve probably seen the sign ‘on strike to savonstrikee lives’. well, as it turns out…we might as well get used to the idea of strikes. 2010 is fast approaching, and while many are blindsided by the olympics, there’s bigger events on the horizons for bc’s population. the provincial government is pretty much hoping everyone is amazed and captured by the olympics and completely ignores the problems waiting for all on the horizons.

a few years ago, with the olympics still a few years away, the liberal government had an idea. the idea was…calm and no hassle with collective bargaining agreements for all unions. how was that accomplished? well you probably guessed it, they threw money at the problem, and placed the end of the contract until after the olympics. thus, obtaining no hassle, no contract talks, no strikes, no headaches from any of the cupe sections during the time leading up to the 2010 games. well…all is well so far, people got most likely the percentage raises they were looking for, and all are happy. however, the effect of this is quite simple…most (if not all) agreements are pretty much set to end in 2010, just after the olympics. combine that with the recent ‘crisis’…and essentially we’re looking at a very long 2010 year. there’s no money to be thrown at the problem, costs have already been cut, and most likely the government will be looking to recover some of the cost. which will simply lead to long talks between both parties…with the simple outcome of more strikes.

judgeendsparameds_news

who’s to blame for this? it’s quite simple that the short-sighted liberal government is to blame for this. they patched up the problem, attached the band-aid solution…and now with the talks approaching we’re all going to pay for this. in their solution, they haven’t fixed anything, yet they managed to delay the inevitable. problem is…most contract talks are coming up in pretty much the same calendar year. what’s the solution? given our chicken government, we’re looking at a cheap and sneaky way out. chances are, there will be more lies fed to everyone. more promises made, waiting to be broken. there will be more cries of ‘we did not know the costs of the olympics’,'we did not anticipate the crisis’, and so on. i won’t be surprised if the liberals are quite hoping the current motions to dismiss the government will be completed. i wont’ be surprised if the liberals will actually help the process (in secret of course). why you might ask. well the thing is quite simple…when shit will hit the fan come post-2010 games…it will be massive. jobs will be lost, people will be pissed and strikes will happen all over the place. the blame will be thrown, quite rightly so, at the liberal government (even thou some or at least half the blame should be put on the shoulders of the fools that voted this government for a third time into place). the only question remains…if the elections (which you have to admit are quite imminent) will happen before the problems start or during. either way, come march 2010…we’re in a hole.