Skip to content
Archive of posts tagged waste of money

be part of ‘my’ plan…

this post was bound to happen sometimes, and since it’s been delayed by quite a bit i’m going to be throwing more than just one subject in it.

the first subject for today’s post is the newly opened ‘canada line’, yes the massive over priced, poorly managed 2 billion costing sky train line that links richmond to vancouver…and let’s not forget…the first rapid transit from a canadian international airport to the respective downtown core. so if by now you didn’t pick up on it…i’m not very happy about the project. don’t get me wrong, i think a rapid transit line should been build 10 years ago. it’s not the idea i have a problem with…is how they went about doing it. translink has not only over-spent, but managed to ensure their salaries got bigger and bigger. and what did the public get? well…they got a campaign with the motto ‘be part of the plan’. the only options one has when offering their useless opinion (useless since translink won’t take it into account) is whether to increase one form of tax over the other. there are essentially five options…either increase transit far (why not), increase taxation either on gasoline, car insurance, land taxation…or other forms of taxation. they offer no insight on how their decisions are made, no insight on how they chose who to contract for work being done…but once every year they essentially ask for more money. on the day the line opened…there were shows and freebies given out at each station…our drunken leader made sure he self-promoted his white smile over the news on that day as if he managed to bring something unique to vancouver. the speach included reference to this being the only line of its type in canada (the airport to downtown part)…well that might be the case…but vancouver as we know it wants to compare itself with the major metropolitan cities of the world. and in that comparison, well they’re at the bottom of the list. all major european cities have some sort of rapid public transportation to and from their airport…which are cheaper and some of which include free wi-fi. now that being said, other news were given to the public on the same day…only this one was not so publicly stated and more or less hidden.

our premier decided to share the news that healthcare is looking at a reduced budget for next year of roughly $60 million. yes, the news was first provided to the public on the same day as the crappy line took on its first rider. this was followed yesterday by the full report…in which the most important sectors of our society are facing budgetary cuts. that implies the school system and healthcare. however, most of the throne speech yesterday was to defend the ‘hst’ tax (if you don’t know what it is…then google is your friend). i may be slow, but i missed where any of the things on the agenda from yesterday are helping the not so ‘rich’ part of society. more tax, less money to public services…and well let’s face it…the poorer will stay poorer, but with less public service.

all the promises that fooled bc-ers into voting liberal a few months back are not only not being followed, we’re getting the opposite. hold on a second…isn’t that what happened the first two times around? even the americans got it right after during their third try…how is it that bc-ers don’t. the cycle continues, the rich will stay richer…the hst will help business (which by all means has been on the agenda every single time drunken gordo got the power) and essentially squeeze even more money out of the working lower classes. so congratulations to those who voted, congratulations to the ndp leader who can’t seem to figure out she can’t win an election and congratulations for the drunken leader who managed to fool everyone yet again. at this point one does wonder on the iq level of the voting population…

rental adds

recently i started to pay a bit more attention to rental adds on craigslist, keeping an eye on various places, seeing how the rent in specific areas is, and so on. i figured i should at least be somewhat informed on the prices of areas of interest when the time comes to spread the wings…and leave the ‘nest’. anyhow, long story short….i also figured that if something pops up too good to miss i will contact them asap. and, so i did. a few adds on craigslist were just that…’too good…not to contact’. cheap yet offering quite a bit. so, i send an email, asking for information and when/where to set up a meeting to see the place.

first (of two emails to two different adds) email i send was on saturday and i receive quite a lengthy email in response with too much information in regards to the religious views as well as the type of ‘volunteer’ work they do in africa. now, before i go into how the two different emails are alike…what put me off responding to the first was simply the request of too much personal information to be kept on ‘file’ by the person. so…given i didn’t respond. however, on sunday i run into another add that sounded like quite a deal…so i emailed again, asking for a time to see the place. same type of email comes back as a reply. i guess…i needed two emails to fully confirm that if an add on craigslist is too good to be true…then it is…

the two responses…both spend time focusing on the religious views as well as the support work done in africa by the potential owner of the place to be rented…now, i highly doubt that two different apartments, at separate addresses in downtown vancouver have either the same owner…or different owners that do the same type of work (keep in mind…the names on each email are different). they both asked pretty much the same nine (or so) questions…and both had the keys with them in africa…which are to be mailed if terms agreed upon. the apartment can be viewed from the outside…but no interior inspection…until agreed to rent the place… not to mention…the information requested is to be kept on file…in case receipt is to be issued…

i guess i needed two adds to make the full conclusion that what seems too cheap for what is offered is most likely spam…or an attempt at phishing for information. i recall the ‘bank-type’ emails being sent out…or various network website emails asking for username/password to be re-typed, etc. but i must state…i wasn’t expecting this…

here’s the set of questions to be filled in as part of the application received in the second email:

========= RENT APPLICATION FORM ============

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
Also,Pls answer these questions below:

1)Your Full Name______________________________________

2)Present Address(where you reside now) & Phone Number______________________________

3)How old are you _____________________________

4)Are you married ______________________________ _____

5)How many people will be living in the apartment___________________________

6)Do you have a pet _________________________________________

7)Do you have a car __________________________________________

8)Occupation _________________________________________________

9)How long are you willing to stay _________________________________________

10)When do you intend to move in _________________________________________

11)1 month Or 2 month deposit needed ______________________________________

12) Pictures of all the Occupant that will stay in my apartment______________________________________

oh, and before i forget…both owners are willing to give the apartment based on trust alone…provided you fill out the (or answer) questions…

another four…

after 8 years of sitting in opposition the best the ndp could come up with was ‘take back your bc’. fair enough, however one must ask if this was the best approach. the statement is quite direct and if analyzed a bit it summarizes the method intended to be used in order to defeat the liberals; that being…insult and bash the liberals. throw mud at them, hoping it sticks and the ndp gets the majority of seats…that was not to be so.

i guess the ndp, lead by its fearless leader, did not pay attention to how the political race developed south of the boarder. the eventual winner of the presidential race overcame two campaigns of bashing by the opposition to win the presidency. in each he did start behind in the polls, yet he stuck to his guns, promoted who he was instead of destroyed or attempting to destroy the image/reputation of the opposition. to add to this, his opposition did just that…attempted at destroying his image…and lost. the ndp either didn’t pay attention or just simply did not learn. their only method throughout the campaign was to try and discredit the liberals. my take…don’t worry as the liberals have done it enough by themselves…trying to do more looks like it back-fired. so…perhaps it would have helped if at least half of the resources would have been wasted on promoting what the ndp stood for…what they planned to do…and how they plan to make bc better…somewhat similar to what the liberals choose to do. not to mention…it doesn’t help when the leader of the party trying to take over is seen as a potential premier that can’t do ‘no worst’ than the current one…overall, i don’t think this election was won by the liberals…but lost by the ndp due to a some quite foolish choice in how to promote themselves…